July 19, 2026 Proper 11 First Congregational Church UCC, Brimfield MA
Romans 8:12-25 So then, brothers and sisters, we are obligated, not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh—for if you live according to the flesh, you will die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live.
For all who are led by the Spirit of God are children of God.
For you did not receive a spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you received a spirit of adoption. When we cry, “Abba! Father!” it is that very Spirit bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, then heirs: heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, if we in fact suffer with him so that we may also be glorified with him.
I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory about to be revealed to us. For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the children of God, for the creation was subjected to futility, not of its own will, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its enslavement to decay and will obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God. We know that the whole creation has been groaning together as it suffers together the pains of labor, and not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly while we wait for adoption, the redemption of our bodies.
For in hope we were saved.
Now hope that is seen is not hope, for who hopes for what one already sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.
May the words of my mouth and the meditations of our hearts be acceptable in your sight, O God our Rock and our Redeemer. Amen.
Last week, I tried to explain how Paul understands our relationship with God, and then afterwards, in conversations with folks who heard me, I realized that I needed to be clearer about what’s going on here and why it’s good news for us all.
This can be complicated, so if you’re confused afterwards, let’s talk.
First off, remember that Paul pretty much always things in terms of off or on, right or wrong, this or that. He’s really into those kinds of choices, and really really uninterested in gray areas. So he says that human beings like us are either good or not good, and he uses the words flesh and spirit to illustrate his dichotomy.
This is a problem, because over the centuries, it’s come to mean that flesh, the body, is bad, and spirituality, spirit, is good. That’s led to thinking that pleasure is a bad thing; back in the olden days, it led to rules about dancing, or reading books for fun on Sunday, or going to the movies, and indeed it still does lead to those kinds of body-denying choices.
But that’s wrong. When Paul says “flesh”, what he means is “all that’s under our control.” He’s not saying, don’t dance. He’s not even saying don’t dance on Sundays. What he’s saying is that we are, even at our best, not capable of always turning down an extra cookie, that we will (not “might”, but “will”) from time to time choose to satisfy ourselves rather than taking care of the other. And again, he’s not talking about those times when we had to step back to care for ourselves or our family. Care for self and others is a good, but we are not able, not capable of balancing our needs, our family’s needs and the world’s needs, not all the time, not in every circumstance.
Now I’ve always thought of Paul as one of those people who wake up at 2am thinking again about that time he cheated his friend in third grade, or the time he accidentally hurt the feelings of the kindest person in the synagogue. You know those kinds of things; they happen to all of us.
Paul reminds us that God deserves our best, and yet we are not capable of giving our best, not consistently. Not that we’re mean, or cheesy, or that we don’t care, but that it’s just not in our nature to always do the right thing.
The other night I was watching the Indiana Fever play the Golden State Valkyries in WNBA basketball. Caitlin Clark, that amazing guard out of Iowa — that woman who’s always making 3-pointers? She couldn’t make a shot that night, not if they’d put the basket down so low I could have dunked. She’s one of the best basketball players in the world, and she couldn’t make a shot.
That’s the kind of not perfect that Paul is talking about. That’s the “flesh”, not able this time to make a basket, not able some other time to reach out in kindness, for whatever reason.
Paul calls this inability sin. We don’t use the3 word sin in quite that way anymore. We don’t say we’re sinful because we’re made this way, for instance. These days, we reserve “sin” for those acts we deliberately choose, for those times we deliberately or negligently act in an evil way, or even times when we irresponsibly forget to do the right.
However you define sin, what Paul is talking about is the very human propensity to do less, eat more, slack off, choose the easier way, and so on.
Now whether you think that God is waiting for you to make a mistake, or choose the lazy path, or whether you yourself get upset when you’ve done something wrong, the good news here is that God is not actually looking for, expecting, or really even wanting perfection from us.
We make up those tough rules about what’s right and what’s wrong to help us remember that what God is really after is that we treat one another with decency and respect, not rigid perfectionism.
Have I told you about the choirs (that’s right, more than one) in my first parish. We had three choirs, because the parish had three churches. It was as if we shared a pastor with Southbridge and Charlton, and each church had a choir. And each choir had a personality. And yes, in the summers, I led three worship services each Sunday — 8:30, 9:45 and 11:15. I never nattered on for hours, and couldn’t do coffee hour, but at least each church was only about 15 minutes from the next….
My first church had a superb choir, stocked with people who also sang in the Portland City Opera — really good voices who were expert sight readers. And we had a modern digital electronic organ, played by a guy who knew how to get good music out of it. Their music program was super.
My second church also had a great choir, led by a music teacher from a neighboring school — and he played trumpet, so we always had a trumpeter for our Easter sunrise service. The organist was really good and understood our Hammond B3 (tho they’re not really designed for churches). She played in a bar on Saturday nights, and sometimes those jazzy rhythms showed up on Sunday morning, especially when she hadn’t yet been home!
And then there was the third church — it was a summer only church — primitive by most standards — we didn’t even have running water, just electricity. The church chancel (the space down front) was covered with inexpensive bathroom carpeting, the flowers were Woolworth’s grade plastic, and for an instrument we had an old upright piano. Every spring they had to clear the deceased mice out of the piano before the season began. The choir director was a violin teacher who was going deaf. And the choir was composed of half a dozen folks whose best vocal days were way behind them, and one man who, in the winter, was the head of the music program for the schools over in Newton MA.
If what God wanted out of us was technical perfection, I guess it might have been the first church that came closest… because they had the most natural talent. But you know, they took their gifts for granted. Because they were all good sight readers, they didn’t bother to rehearse. They didn’t even plan much in advance, but the first person who showed up on Sunday would browse through their file of anthems and pick one out. They’d sing through it once or twice, and that was it. A lick and a promise got the job done.
It was that third church that came to impress me. They didn’t have the talent, or the quality instrument. They worked with a lot of shortcomings — and every Sunday did their darndest to present to God and the congregation their very best. It wasn’t, to be honest, very good. But it was the best they had. Every thing they did in that church was about love of neighbor and extravagant welcome.
Paul is reminding us that all too often, we judge our worth by the things we have, by outward signs of success — the newest this, or the best that — but what God is really pleased by, what God hopes we look to, is not things, not stuff, but trying hard, doing our best. showing love, speaking up for justice. He believes that the day is coming when the whole world will be governed by that kind of welcome, where everyone will have a place at the table, where people will not be judged differently by the color of their skin, or by their physical abilities.
He says the whole creation has been groaning together as it suffers together the pains of labor, and not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly while we wait for adoption, the redemption of our bodies. For in hope we were saved.
It’s that hope that sustains us when the lack of not just perfection but even basic decency smacks us in the face. It’s that hope which allows us to get up in the morning to do it all again. God loves us now. God is not waiting for us to “get it” or get better at whatever. God loves us today, tomorrow, and always, and that gives us that oomph to keep on going.
Amen.
© 2026, Virginia H. Child